A bipartisan bill would push the federal hemp THC ban to 2028, buying time for farmers, brewers, and lawmakers to replace prohibition with regulation.
A bipartisan group of lawmakers is moving to slow down the federal hemp THC ban that Congress quietly enacted during last year’s government shutdown, giving the industry more time to adjust and reopening a debate that many thought was settled.
On January 12, Rep. Jim Baird of Indiana introduced the Hemp Planting Predictability Act, a short bill that would delay implementation of the new federal hemp definition from one year to three. The change would push enforcement from November 2026 to November 2028, buying time for farmers, manufacturers, and regulators to negotiate a regulatory alternative to prohibition.
As reported by Marijuana Moment, the bill arrives after weeks of escalating concern from state officials, brewers, farmers, and hemp trade groups who say the existing timeline is unworkable.
A one-line fix with major consequences
The bill itself is only two pages long and makes a single change. It amends Section 781 of the appropriations law that ended the 2025 shutdown by striking the phrase “365 days” and replacing it with “3 years.”
That one edit pauses a sweeping policy shift that would otherwise take effect next year. Under the shutdown deal, most hemp-derived products would be treated as illegal marijuana if they contain more than 0.4 milligrams of total THC per container. The law also bans synthetic and chemically converted cannabinoids and redefines hemp in a way that collapses much of the post-2018 market.
High Times previously broke down the implications of that language in detail in its coverage of the shutdown deal that recriminalized hemp, setting off a one-year countdown that many operators described as existential.
Bipartisan backing and planting season pressure
Baird’s bill has attracted bipartisan support from the start. Initial cosponsors include Rep. James Comer of Kentucky, Rep. Gabe Evans of Colorado, Rep. Tim Moore of North Carolina, and Rep. Angie Craig of Minnesota.
In statements following the bill’s introduction, lawmakers framed the delay as a matter of basic agricultural reality.
“Planting and growing crops requires planning well in advance,” Baird said, noting that farmers made investment decisions under the framework created by the 2018 Farm Bill and now face sudden legal uncertainty.
Craig echoed that concern, saying recent changes “pulled the rug out from under Minnesota’s hemp producers, craft brewers, and retailers” at a time when many small businesses are already dealing with rising costs and instability.
Those concerns align with what High Times reported in November, when states began signaling they would push back against the federal cap rather than immediately dismantle regulated hemp markets.
Industry response: buy time, not immunity
The U.S. Hemp Roundtable welcomed the bill, calling it a necessary pause rather than an attempt to avoid oversight. In a statement, the group said the extension would allow lawmakers and regulators to work toward “a responsible regulatory framework” instead of rushing into prohibition.
Jonathan Miller, general counsel for the trade group, said the delay would give farmers clarity as they make planting decisions and reduce the risk of supply chain disruptions and stranded crops.
“This bipartisan legislation puts more time on the clock for thoughtful policymaking,” Miller said, emphasizing that the goal remains regulation that protects consumers while preserving a legal agricultural industry.
That framing mirrors arguments High Times explored in its analysis of why the hemp ban happened in the first place and whether age limits and enforcement, rather than criminalization, could have addressed lawmakers’ concerns. In January, High Times argued that the U.S. already knows how to regulate intoxicants and asked why it cannot simply card for hemp THC the way it does for beer.
A policy contradiction comes into focus
The timing of the delay bill also highlights growing contradictions inside federal cannabis policy.
As High Times reported in December, a memo from the Congressional Research Service acknowledged that federal agencies may not have the resources or a clear plan to enforce the hemp ban once it takes effect. That analysis raised doubts about whether the prohibition could be meaningfully implemented at all.
At the same time, President Donald Trump has publicly urged Congress to examine the hemp definition to protect access to full-spectrum CBD, even as he signed the shutdown bill that triggered the ban. Those mixed signals have added urgency to calls for a pause.
In the THC Group’s Policy, Decoded newsletter, Shawn Collins described the bill as a survival maneuver for the 2026 planting season, arguing that farmers cannot risk capital on crops that may be reclassified as contraband before harvest. He also noted that a delay creates space for Congress to reconcile competing federal priorities rather than locking in an arbitrary threshold.
Not a repeal, but a reopening
The Hemp Planting Predictability Act does not undo the hemp ban, and there is no guarantee it will pass. It is one of several competing efforts now circulating in Washington, including a broader Senate proposal from Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley that would replace prohibition with a national regulatory framework.
What the bill does accomplish is reopening a fight that Congress tried to settle quietly during a shutdown. It signals that the consequences of the hemp ban are now visible enough to force a second look.
As High Times has documented across its reporting, from the impact on seeds and genetics to the risk of uneven state enforcement, the shutdown deal reshaped the cannabis landscape far beyond what most lawmakers publicly acknowledged at the time.
For now, the clock has not stopped. But for the first time since November, there is a serious attempt in Congress to slow it down.
<p>The post Hemp’s Death Sentence Gets a Stay of Execution first appeared on High Times.</p>
