Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Thursday, September 10
    • Home
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn VKontakte
    Smoke Insights
    Smoke Insights
    Law

    Mike Tyson, Ric Flair claim fraud in celebrity cannabis brand efforts

    adminBy adminJanuary 19, 2026No Comments6 Mins Read

    Note: This story has been updated with comment from a spokesperson for the defendants. 

    Legendary boxer Mike Tyson and professional wrestling icon Ric Flair’s attempts to launch celebrity cannabis brands resulted in “a brazen … conspiracy involving criminal wire fraud, embezzlement (and) money laundering,” the pair alleged in a federal lawsuit filed last month.

    Tyson and Flair are the lead plaintiffs in a 76-page complaint filed Dec. 19 in U.S. District Court in Illinois that accuses four former executives and shareholders in Carma, a Chicago-based branding company that’s also a plaintiff, of “defrauding” the celebrities and using the firm “as their own personal piggy bank.”

    The suit alleges 21 separate counts of fraud and breach of contract. It seeks damages, legal fees and costs “in excess of $50 million” – and, should it go to trial and result in discovery, promises to shine a light on how investors and brand partners may have attempted to cash out of deals quickly following the $32 billion cannabis industry’s boom period rather than build lasting presences.

    Additionally, according to the suit, the former executives at Carma made “unauthorized” side deals selling the celebrities’ likenesses, including with a vape manufacturer and a licensed California cannabis cultivator, that “resulted in financial losses” to Carma “but lined (their own) pockets.”

    Mike Tyson, Ric Flair and Future claim partners in celebrity cannabis brands defrauded them

    The suit names as defendants:

    • Chad Bronstein, Carma’s former chairman and president, who owned a boat slip next to Flair’s in Tampa
    • Adam Wilks, Carma’s former CEO
    • Nicole Cosby, whom the suit claims was a board member before becoming chief legal and licensing officer
    • James Case, a Carma shareholder who received shares “free of charge” from Bronstein

    No attorney information for the four defendants was available Thursday, according to a court docket.

    After this story was initially published, a spokesperson for Bronstein provided comment from the defendants’ attorneys.

    “This complaint is pure fiction dressed up as a lawsuit,” Jonathan Cyrluk, who is representing Bronstein and Cosby, said in a statement.

    “Before filing, the plaintiffs tried to intimidate my clients with settlement demands that read more like a shakedown than a legal claim— demanding millions of dollars and attempting to force others to surrender their Carma shares. My clients won’t be bullied and are prepared to knock out this meritless lawsuit in court.

    Tyson, Flair lawsuit is a ‘meritless’ shakedown attempt, defendants claim

    Terry Campbell, who is representing Wilks, called the lawsuit “as credible as the people they come from – in short, the allegations are without substance.”

    “This is nothing more than an attempt to spit out an earful of salacious headlines and attempt to coerce my client into paying money to them when he did nothing wrong. We will fight these meritless allegations – both the facts and the law are squarely on our side.”

    The defendants have not filed a response in court, records show.

    Attempts to contact Tyson, Carma’s current CEO, and Flair were not immediately successful.

    A fourth plaintiff, Miami-based “global hemp company” LGNDS, which purchased the rights to use Tyson’s likeness on “hemp products, mushroom products, nicotine products, kava products, and other merchandise, such as shirts, pants, sweaters, and footwear.”

    The suit also mentions musician Future, born Nayvadius DeMun Cash, as a celebrity whose licensing rights the former Carma figures allegedly sold without the celebrity’s consent.

    Future, who has a Florida-based cannabis brand called EVOL by Future, is not named as a plaintiff in the suit.

    Allegations that celebrity cannabis branding efforts became vehicles for ‘self dealing’

    The suit alleges a broad pattern of misconduct, including securities fraud as well as unapproved sponsorships with the Cleveland Cavaliers NBA franchise and “dozens” of unauthorized sublicenses that began shortly after Tyson, Bronstein and Wilks formed Carma HoldCo, “also known as Tyson 2.0, in 2021.”

    The company used Tyson’s likeness and intellectual property to market products, including “cannabis pre-rolls, vape cartridges, and hemp gummies.”

    According to the suit, Bronstein and Wilks told investors that Carma, valued at $80 million, was in fact worth $120 million – and sold their own shares in the company “for profits in excess of $1 million.”

    The suit also accuses Bronstein, Wilks and Case of soliciting personal gifts, including $50,000 Rolex watches, from Carma business partners instead of the normal licensing fees for using the celebrity likenesses.

    The suit accuses Bronstein of forming a new company to market Flair’s likeness, called Ric Flair Drip Inc., in which Flair was tricked into unknowingly signing away his intellectual property.

    Bronstein then sold a significant portion of the company to Carma but cut Flair out of the deal, the suit states.

    The defendants also paid themselves exorbitant salaries and awarded themselves excessive bonuses, according to the lawsuit.

    Northern California cannabis connection, investor playing both sides of deals

    According to the lawsuit, Wilks also served as the CEO at Captor Capital, a cannabis investment firm that held stakes in Northern Emeralds, an upscale cannabis brand based in Northern California, and in DomPen, a vape company.

    In August 2022,  Carma and Northern Emeralds signed a deal that would see the cannabis firm market and produce Tyson 2.0-branded cannabis flower and pre-rolls partially in exchange for royalties, according to the lawsuit.

    However, “From 2022 to 2025, Northern Emeralds failed to pay CARMA more than $1.25 million pursuant to the agreement,” the suit alleges.

    The suit claims that this was partly because Wilks received equity in Northern Emeralds in exchange for waiving the payments for his role at Carma.

    Instead, loaned Carma cash to Northern Emeralds, which still owes “more than $140,000” in unpaid loans.

    Northern Emeralds did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Subscribe to the MJBiz Factbook  

    Exclusive industry data and analysis to help you make informed business decisions and avoid costly missteps. All the facts, none of the hype. 

    What you will get: 

    • Monthly and quarterly updates, with new data & insights
    • Financial forecasts + capital investment trends
    • State-by-state guide to regulations, taxes & market opportunities
    • Annual survey of cannabis businesses
    • Consumer insights
    • And more!

    Does celebrity cannabis work?

    Celebrity brands have had mixed success in the cannabis industry.

    As MJBizDaily reported in 2023, celebrity brands outsold traditional cannabis brands “by a healthy margin” that year.

    However, Flair’s products commanded less at retail than average brands, according to Headset data.

    That could be attributed to the conventional wisdom that consumers are more concerned with product quality and cost – and the elusive concept of “authenticity” – than a famous name printed on the package.

    Still, Tyson, a Las Vegas resident, seems to have poured more effort than some into marketing a diverse line of cannabis products, including appearances at MJBizCon.

    These include Ear Bites, a cheeky reference to his notorious 1997 heavyweight championship bout with Evander Holyfield, in which Tyson bit off a portion of Holyfield’s ear.

    Source link

    brand cannabis Celebrity Claim Efforts Flair Fraud Mike Ric Tyson
    Previous ArticleEven After All These Years Tobacco Control Keeps Failing: Exploring The Issue From Different Angles
    Next Article Montana Retailers Have Sold More Than $1 Billion Worth Of Recreational Marijuana Since Legalization Took Effect
    admin

    Related Posts

    Welsh Liberal Democrats Pass Motion Protecting Cannabis Patients

    April 16, 2026

    Building Smarter Cannabis Operations Through Partnership – Cannabis & Tech Today

    April 16, 2026

    Army Reserve Major Loses Promotion Due to Ownership in New York Cannabis Company

    April 15, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    From Our Partners
    Sponsors
    Copyright © 2026. SmokeInsights.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    A practical guide to using Diners Club at UK online casinos in 2026, including real operator comparisons, deposit mechanics, bonuses and the best alternatives when the card is not available. read the full Diners Club UK casino guide

    A no-nonsense look at Dogecoin casinos available to UK players in 2026. We cover legal status, top sites, bonuses, games, and the real risks of gambling with DOGE. explore the best Dogecoin casinos for UK players

    A practical guide to UK casino sites that accept eCheck-style bank transfers, with licensed operators, payment speed, bonus checks, and the truth about ACH eCheck in the UK. read the full echeck casino UK guide

    A practical guide to UK online casinos that accept eCheque in 2026, including the legal reality, top offshore brands that still process eCheck deposits, and safer alternatives for British players. read the full eCheque casinos UK guide

    EntroPay shut down years ago, so no UK casino accepts it in 2026. Find out why, see the best UK casino alternatives, and compare real brands with bonuses and payment methods. read the full entropay alternatives guide

    A no-nonsense guide to Ethereum casinos for UK players in 2026: top sites, bonus reality, UK legal status, and fast payout options. read the Ethereum casino rankings

    Compare the best UK casinos that accept e-wallets in 2026. See which PayPal, Skrill, Neteller, and MuchBetter casinos offer fast withdrawals, fair bonuses, and UKGC safety. Read our guide to UK e-wallet casinos for 2026

    A practical guide to giropay casinos for UK players in 2026: which offshore brands still list giropay, how deposits work, alternatives, and the risks of non-UKGC sites. read the full giropay casino guide for UK players

    A practical guide to UK-licensed online casinos that accept Google Pay deposits in 2026. Covers how Google Pay works, top operators, bonuses, withdrawal limits, safety, and alternatives. read the complete guide to Google Pay casinos UK

    iDEAL is a Dutch payment method and not available at UK online casinos. This guide explains why, lists the best alternatives like Trustly and PayPal, and ranks the top UKGC-licensed casinos for 2026. read the full iDEAL UK casino guide